Case LawHigh Court › Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Cir...

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-3(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Santosh Jain

High Court 27 Jun 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-3(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Santosh Jain
Date of order
27 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-3(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Santosh Jain, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR TAX Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. 13 of 2017 Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-3(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus Shri Santosh Jain Prop. Arihant Mining Company, Kusum Complex,Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For AppellantFor Respondent :Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate:Mr. S. Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Chief Justice Judgment on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 27.06.2017 1. Learned Counsel for the Appellant-department submits that on the basisof the quantum involved, the subject matter of this appeal is below themonetary limits prescribed for prosecution of litigation in terms of theCircular No. 21/2015 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue, Central Board Direct Taxes. He also points out that thequestion of law raised has already been decided in a different case. Werecord this submission as well.of the quantum involved, the subject matter of this appeal is below themonetary limits prescribed for prosecution of litigation in terms of theCircular No. 21/2015 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue, Central Board Direct Taxes. He also points out that thequestion of law raised has already been decided in a different case. Werecord this submission as well. 2. We close this case by permitting the appeal to be withdrawn for theaforesaid reasons. aforesaid reasons. Kishore Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) Chief Justice Judge (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan