Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4 Jaipur Rajasthan302005 v. Order
High Court
22 Nov 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4 Jaipur Rajasthan302005 v. Order
Date of order
22 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4 Jaipur Rajasthan302005 v. Order, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 398/2022
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13861/2021
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-4 Jaipur Rajasthan302005
----Appellant
Versus
Clay Craft (India) Private Limited, having Registered Office at B-12, MGD Market, Jaipur Rajasthan through its Director PadamNarain Agarwal S/o Kailash Narain Agarwal aged about 72 yearsR/o 17, Opposite Kamdhenu Shopping Centre, Jaipur Rajasthan302016
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak Advocate. For Respondent(s): Mr. Mahendra Gargieya Advocate through Video Conferencing.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
22/11/2023
Heard.
When the matter comes up for consideration on admission,Mr. Mahendra Gargieya, Advocate enters appearance on behalf ofthe respondent. He informs the Court that as a subsequent event,the proceedings have been dropped vide order dated 31.07.2022.
In that view of the matter, no further orders are required tobe passed. The appeal is, accordingly, closed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
SANJAY KUMAWAT-56
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue