Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle Ii, Patna v. M/S Alkem Laboratories Ltd
High Court
29 Jun 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle Ii, Patna v. M/S Alkem Laboratories Ltd
Date of order
29 Jun 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle Ii, Patna v. M/S Alkem Laboratories Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the aforesaid circumstances, the present appeal is also dismissed for the same reasons.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
11 29-06-2015
Jagdish/-
U
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.189 of 2009
======================================================
1. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Patna
2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle II, Patna.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
M/S Alkem Laboratories Ltd.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mrs. Shilpi Keshri, Advocate Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Jr. S.C. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Advocate.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTAand HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRAORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
It is submitted by learned counsels for the parties that the similar grounds and substantial questions of law sought to be raised by the appellants have already been considered and dismissed by this Court in M.A. No. 404 of 2008, CIT (1), Patna and Anr. Vs. Alkem Laboratories Ltd., with respect to the same respondent by order dated 30.03.2015.
In the aforesaid circumstances, the present appeal is also dismissed for the same reasons.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Anjana Mishra,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue