Case LawHigh Court › Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ex...

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Mahavir Gaushala Trust K.k. Road Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

High Court 13 Oct 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Mahavir Gaushala Trust K.k. Road Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
13 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Mahavir Gaushala Trust K.k. Road Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Recording this submission, the request to withdraw this appeal is hereby allowedand the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR0Tax Case No. 162 of 2017 (Arising out of order dated 12.5.2017 in ITA No. 136/RPR/2016 of the learned IncomeTax Appellate Triubnal, Raipur Bench, Raipur) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellant Versus Shri Mahavir Gaushala Trust K.K. Road Moudhapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent ___________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Shri Amit Chaudhari, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri Sharad Kumar Gupta, Judge. Order on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 13/10/2017 1.Learned counsel for the Appellant-Department submits that this appeal is belowthe monetary limit in terms of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes notification dated 10.12.2015and there are no question for consideration in this appeal which required to bedecided in terms of that notification.the monetary limit in terms of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes notification dated 10.12.2015and there are no question for consideration in this appeal which required to bedecided in terms of that notification. 2.Recording this submission, the request to withdraw this appeal is hereby allowedand the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan