In Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Goyalenergy And Steel Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
PRIYANKAVERMA
Digitally signed byPRIYANKA VERMADate: 2025.04.0317:29:25 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
TAXC No. 156 of 2023
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus M/S GOYALENERGY AND STEEL PVT. LTD.
TAXC No. 140 of 2023
Order Sheet
03/04/2025
Mr. Ajay Kumrani, counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sahu, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Neelabh Dubey, counsel for the respondent.
TAXC No. 140 of 2023
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and isgranted 7 days’ time to remove the default(s), failing which,this tax case shall stand dismissed without further referenceto this Bench.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Judge
Priyanka
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.