Case Law › High Court › Associates India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. Th...

Associates India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range 8 (3), Mumbai

High Court 22 Jun 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Jun 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Associates India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range 8 (3), Mumbai, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

SHRADDHAKAMLESHTALEKAR Digitally signed bySHRADDHAKAMLESH TALEKARDate: 2022.06.2419:47:19 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2009 M/s. Pharmaceutical Research Associates India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.Vs. .. Appellant 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Range 8 (3), Mumbai .... Respondents **** Mr.Atul K. Jasani for appellant. Ms.Priti Chhabria i/b Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondents. **** CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] JUNE 2022 PC : 1.The learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. 2.Leave, as prayed for, is granted. 3.The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.