Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Rajiv Malik
High Court
09 May 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Rajiv Malik
Date of order
09 May 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Rajiv Malik, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of aforesaid submission this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.485 of 2006
======================================================
1.Commissiner Of Income Tax
2.Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna.
.... .... Appellants
Versus
Shri Rajiv Malik, C/O Sri Vijay Kumar Malik 1/158 Gali
Bagichi Wali, Punja Sharif, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110 006
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. S.K.Sharan For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
5
09-05-2012 Learned counsel for the appellant, Commissioner,
Income Tax, submits that in view of Section 268-A and the instruction already issued by the Board, the mandatory requirement for filing appeal in this Court was Rs.4,00000/- or above whereas in this appeal the tax effects involved is below Rs.2,00000/-.
In view of aforesaid submission this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
Naresh/-
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.