Case LawHigh Court › Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle...

Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Rajiv Malik

High Court 09 May 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Rajiv Malik
Date of order
09 May 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Rajiv Malik, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of aforesaid submission this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.485 of 2006 ====================================================== 1.Commissiner Of Income Tax 2.Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna. .... .... Appellants Versus Shri Rajiv Malik, C/O Sri Vijay Kumar Malik 1/158 Gali Bagichi Wali, Punja Sharif, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110 006 .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s : Mr. S.K.Sharan For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH) 5 09-05-2012 Learned counsel for the appellant, Commissioner, Income Tax, submits that in view of Section 268-A and the instruction already issued by the Board, the mandatory requirement for filing appeal in this Court was Rs.4,00000/- or above whereas in this appeal the tax effects involved is below Rs.2,00000/-. In view of aforesaid submission this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) Naresh/- (Vikash Jain, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan