Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna v. Shri Praveen Kumar
High Court
06 Jul 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna v. Shri Praveen Kumar
Date of order
06 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna v. Shri Praveen Kumar, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the above circumstances, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
7 06-07-2015
Jagdish/- U
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.504 of 2006
======================================================
1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna
2. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Patna
.... .... Appellant/s Versus
Shri Praveen Kumar, S/o- Dr. Kashi Nath Prasad Sinha, New Delhi, Dehri on Sone, District – Rohtas
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C.
Mrs. Archana Prasad, Jr. S.C. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
Heard learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue.
It is admitted by learned Sr. Standing Counsel
appearing for the appellant-Income Tax Department that the tax effect in the present matters are much below than what is provided under the relevant circulars of the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
No substantial question of law of recurring nature could also be pointed out by learned counsel for the appellants.
In the above circumstances, the appeal is dismissed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Anjana Mishra, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.