Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Mahavir Prasad Chandak
High Court
28 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Mahavir Prasad Chandak
Date of order
28 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-1, Patna v. Shri Mahavir Prasad Chandak, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.2 of 2007
======================================================
1.Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Patna
2.Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-1, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellant
Versus
Shri Mahavir Prasad Chandak, 234/3A, AJC Bose Road, 5[th] Floor, FMC Fortune, Calcutta-20
.... .... Assessee/Respondent
======================================================
Appearance :For the Appellant : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. D.V. Pathy, Advocate
Mr. Abhi Sarkar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
6. 28-10-2013
Heard the learned advocates.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the matter at issue is
less than Rs. four lakhs. In view of the monetary limits imposed by the Government of India under Section 268A of the Income tax Act, 1961, this Appeal is not maintainable.
Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.