Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Patna v. Cachet Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Limited, Exhibition Road, Patna
High Court
04 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Patna v. Cachet Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Limited, Exhibition Road, Patna
Date of order
04 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Patna v. Cachet Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Limited, Exhibition Road, Patna, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.155 of 2006
======================================================
1.Commissioner Of Income –Tax-I, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna
2.Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Patna
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
Cachet Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Limited, Exhibition Road, Patna
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr. Standing Counsel Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Manish Rastogi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
5 04-10-2012
Learned counsel for the appellants i.e. for the Revenue fairly admits that the tax effect involved in this appeal is much below Rs.four lakhs and hence, this appeal should not have been preferred in view of instructions issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 24.10.2005.
In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
sk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.