Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna v. M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna
High Court
29 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna v. M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna
Date of order
29 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna v. M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.237 of 2006
======================================================
1. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna
2. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellants Versus
M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna
.... ....Assessee/Respondent
====================================================== With
Miscellaneous Appeal No.238 of 2006
======================================================
1. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna
2. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellants
Versus
M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna
.... .... Assessee/Respondent
======================================================
With
Miscellaneous Appeal No.239 of 2006
======================================================
1. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna
2. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellants
Versus
M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna
.... ....Assessee/Respondent
======================================================
With
Miscellaneous Appeal No.241 of 2006
======================================================
1. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna
2. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-2, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellants
Versus
M/S Saran Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Kumar Tower, Boring Road, Patna
.... ....Assessee/ Respondent
======================================================
Appearance :
(In MA No.237 of 2006)
For the Appellants : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C.
Mr. Suman Kr. Mishra, Jr. S.C.
For the Respondent : Mr. Abhi Sarkar, Advocate (In MA No.238 of 2006) For the Appellants : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C.
Mr. Suman Kr. Mishra, Jr. S.C.
For the Respondent : Mr. Abhi Sarkar, Advocate (In MA No.239 of 2006)
For the Appellants : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C.
Mr. Suman Kr. Mishra, Jr. S.C.
For the Respondent : Mr. Abhi Sarkar, Advocate
(In MA No.241 of 2006)
For the Appellants : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Suman Kr. Mishra, Jr. S.C.
For the Respondent : Mr. Abhi Sarkar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTAAnd
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
10 29-01-2015
Heard learned counsel for the appellants-Income Tax
Department.
All the writ applications have been filed against the
common order dated 28.02.2006 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench.
Admittedly, the tax effect for each of the assessment years is below the requirement of Rs.4,00,000/- as per C.B.D.T. circular as prevalent at the relevant time. No substantial question of law of recurring nature is also involved in any of the appeals which relate to the assessment years 1995-96, 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000.
The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
B.T/- U
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.