Case Law › High Court › Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle...

Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1), Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Keshavlal Tank

High Court 03 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

03 Oct 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1), Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Keshavlal Tank, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No. 50/2016 1. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2(1), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellant Versus 1. Shri Keshavlal Tank C/o. M/s. Gopal Meghji, 13, Station Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Appellant – Shri Amit Chaudhari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker DiwakerHon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board by Pritinker Diwaker, J. 03-10-2016 1.Counsel for the appellant very fairly submits that in view of circular dated 10-12-2015 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, this appeal is not maintainable and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw the same. 2.The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker)JUDGE Sd/-(Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.