Case Law › High Court › Asstt. Coxmxdssdoner Oflncome Ts^c 1(1,...

Asstt. Coxmxdssdoner Oflncome Ts^c 1(1, Raipiir v. The Inconie Tax Appehate Tribuiial, Mumbai E-Branch, Mumbaibranch, Mumbai

High Court 03 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

03 Dec 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Asstt. Coxmxdssdoner Oflncome Ts^c 1(1, Raipiir v. The Inconie Tax Appehate Tribuiial, Mumbai E-Branch, Mumbaibranch, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Since fhee is no rcpresentatioxi on behalf of fhe petitioaers m trerorounds, we arc left with no oiher way except to dismiss &e petition forwant of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

^'i } f>- Praveen HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: miASPUR DIVI8ION BBNCH: HON»BLB8HRI 8UNII* KUMAR 8INHA &HON'BLB 8HRI RAJB8HWAR LAL JHAMWAR. JJ.HON'BLB 8HRI RAJB8HWAR LAL JHAMWAR. JJ. LT^STW.P. (Tl ?.R. No/2009 Petitioners 1.Coimnissioner of Income TaXy Raipur 2.Asstt. Coxmxdssdoner oflncome Ts^c 1(1|, Raipiir Versus Respondents 1.The Inconie Tax AppeHate Tribuiial, Mumbai E-Branch, MumbaiBranch, Mumbai 2.M/s.ChhattisgarhElectricityCompanyLtd.(Now kiiow as M/s, Saxda Energy & MineralsLtd. Siltara, Raipur(Now kiiow as M/s, Saxda Energy & MineralsLtd. Siltara, Raipur 3.TheIncome-TaxAppellateTribuiial,NagpixrBench, NagpurBench, Nagpur Wrlt Petition u/A 226 ofthe <%>aistitution ofln^a Appearaaice:- None for the petitioners ia two rounds, Shri Amrito Das, counsel for respondexit No.2. None for respondents No. 1 & 3, ORAL-ORDBR (Passed on 03.12.2009) Per ButtU Kumar Siaha, J. Since fhee is no rcpresentatioxi on behalf of fhe petitioaers m trerorounds, we arc left with no oiher way except to dismiss &e petition forwant of prosecution. Accordingly, W.P. (T) P.R. No. 5240/09 is dismissed for want ofprosecution, Sd/-Sd/-R.L. JhawarSunil Kumar SinhaJudgeJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.