Case LawHigh Court › Asstt. Director Income Tax Investigation...

Asstt. Director Income Tax Investigation, Income Taxdepartment, Alwar v. The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p. Tijara, Distt. Alwarraj.raj

High Court 17 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Asstt. Director Income Tax Investigation, Income Taxdepartment, Alwar v. The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p. Tijara, Distt. Alwarraj.raj
Date of order
17 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Asstt. Director Income Tax Investigation, Income Taxdepartment, Alwar v. The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p. Tijara, Distt. Alwarraj.raj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1746/2017 Asstt. Director Income Tax Investigation, Income TaxDepartment, Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through P.p. Tijara, Distt. AlwarRaj.Raj. 2. Sapat Khan S/o Shri Yusuf Khan B/c Mev, R/o VillageGadpur, Tehsil Tijara, Distt. Alwar Raj.Gadpur, Tehsil Tijara, Distt. Alwar Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Tanvi Sahai for Mr. R.B. MathurFor Respondent(s): Mr. NS Dhakad PPFor Respondent(s): Mr. NS Dhakad PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA -/Order/- 17/01/2019 Admittedly, the period for which FDR was prepared atthe instance of the revisional court below has come to an end. Nodirections are required to be issued by this Court, especially whenIncome Tax Authorities have ample powers to attach the amountkept in FDR. Hence, the present application being misconceived isdismissed. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J Mak/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan