At Kearney Inc v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Internationaltaxation)-1, N.delhi & Anr

$~18 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 11444/2019, CM APPL. 47044/2019 AT KEARNEY INC..... Petitioner Through:Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION)-1, N.DELHI & ANR. ..... RespondentsThrough:Ms.LaxmiGurung,Sr.StandingcounselwithMs.TalhaRahman,Mr.Siddharth Gupta and Mr. Mohd.Shaz Khan, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R %23.01.2020 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that though the principal amounthas been refunded after the issuance of notice in this petition, a portion ofinterest payable under Section 244A has not been remitted. He states thatthis position had been communicated to the respondent on two occasionsalong with calculations. 2. None appeared on behalf of respondent when the matter is called out. 3. Respondents are directed to examine the remaining grievance of thepetitioner with regard to the non-payment of only part interest amount interms of Section 244A. In case, the same is found payable, the respondentsare directed to made payment thereof within the next four weeks. 4. Hence, the respondent shall file a reply within the same period on thatlimited aspect. 5. The petitioner may file the said communication on record. 6. Later on, Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Adv. has appeared on behalf of respondentand states that the rectification proceedings have been undertaken to re-calculate the interest payable under Section 244A and that the balanceinterest amount would be remitted within four weeks. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. 8. Dasti. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 23, 2020Pallavi SANJEEV NARULA, J