Atharva Builders And Developers v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
High Court
20 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Atharva Builders And Developers v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
20 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-15, 2020-21
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Atharva Builders And Developers v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
GAURIAMITGAEKWAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1203 OF 2021
Atharva Builders and Developers
….Petitioner
V/s.
Income Tax Settlement Commission & Ors. ….Respondents
----
Mr. Ajay Singh a/w. Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w. Mr. Pritesh Chatterjee for respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 20[th] DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1Mr. Singh tenders a copy of order dated 28[th] September 2021
issued by CBDT bearing F. No.299/22/2021-Dir (Inv. III)/174 in which
paragraph 3 reads as under :-
“3. In view of the above, the Board in exercise of its power underclause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of the Income-tax Act,1961 (the Act), in order to avoid genuine hardship to assesseesauthorizes the Commissioner of Income-tax, posted as Secretary tothe Settlement Commission prior to 01.02.2021, to admit anapplication for settlement on behalf of the Interim Board filed after31.01.2021, which is the date mentioned in sub-section (5) ofsection 245C of the Act for filing such application, and before30.09.2021 and treat such applications as valid and process themas “pending applications” as defined in clause (eb) of section 245Aof the act.”
2It is stated in the petition that petitioner has filed Settlement
Application for A.Y. 2014-15 to A.Y. 2020-21 on 15[th] March 2021. Since that
is before the extended date of 30[th] September 2021 as mentioned in theorder, Mr. Walve states that petitioner’s application will also be consideredsubject to other conditions being fulfilled in accordance with law.
3
Petition accordingly stands disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.