Atikur Rahman v. Union Of India And 3 Ors. Rep. By Finance Deptt. (Income Tax Bhavan), New Delhi
High Court
13 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Atikur Rahman v. Union Of India And 3 Ors. Rep. By Finance Deptt. (Income Tax Bhavan), New Delhi
Date of order
13 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Atikur Rahman v. Union Of India And 3 Ors. Rep. By Finance Deptt. (Income Tax Bhavan), New Delhi, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal under Section 253 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: With the liberty above, writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
GAHC010028822019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C) 950/2019
1:ATIKUR RAHMAN S/O. LT. ABIDUR RAHMAN, R/O. 22 G. S. ROAD, NEAR INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL, GUWAHATI-05, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
1:UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP. BY FINANCE DEPTT. (INCOME TAX BHAVAN), NEW DELHI.
2:THE COMMISSIONER (APPEAL) INCOME TAX DEPTT. (APPEAL) KAR BHAVAN G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-05 ASSAM.
3:ASSESSING OFFICER INCOME TAX DEPTT. WARD NO. 2 (1) KAR BHAVAN G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-05 ASSAM.
4:BRANCH MANAGER KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. 1ST FLOOR PRITHIVI CENTRE OPPOSITE KFC ULUBARI G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-07
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, INCOME TAX
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
Date : 13-02-2019
ORDER
Heard Mr. M. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel representing respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3.
With the liberty to prefer appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Guwahati under
Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 15.01.2019 of the AssessingOfficer rejecting the stay petition filed by the petitioner, Mr. Phukan prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition.
With the liberty above, writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue