A.t.kearney Limited - India Branch Office v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)1, New Delhi & Anr
High Court
13 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
A.t.kearney Limited - India Branch Office v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)1, New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
13 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In A.t.kearney Limited - India Branch Office v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)1, New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~20
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+W.P.(C) 5613/2019
A.T.KEARNEY LIMITED - INDIA BRANCH OFFICE ..... Petitioner
Through:Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Adv.versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, NEW DELHI & ANR...... Respondents
..... RespondentsThrough:Ms. Laxmi Gurung,Sr. Standingcounsel with Ms. Talha A Rahman,Jr. Standing with Mr. Siddharth Guptaand Mr. Mohd. Shaz Khan, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R%13.01.2020
W.P.(C) 5613/2019 & CM APPL. 24614/2019
1. The assessment order dated 19.12.2019, passed by the Assessing Officerwhich is placed on record shows that the petitioner is entitled to a refund ofRs.7, 49, 03,110/-. The petitioner seeks refund of the said amount.
2. The counsel for the respondents states that the said refund would be paidin due course. Let the same be done positively within four weeks along withapplicable interest as per statute.
3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
JANUARY 13, 2020/Pallavi
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue