In A.t.kearney Limited India Branch Office v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1)(1) International Taxation, New Delhi, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is therefore rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~58
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 7470/2016 & C.M.30747/2016
A.T.KEARNEY LIMITED INDIA BRANCH OFFICE .... Petitioner Through: Mr.Piyush Kaushik, Advocate
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1)(1) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia and Mr.Puneet Rai, Advocates
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R% 18.10.2016
It is stated that the claim in the petition has been satisfied.
The writ petition is therefore rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
OCTOBER 18, 2016 rb
DEEPA SHARMA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue