Atul Ambalal Barot v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Mumbai) & Ors
High Court
15 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Atul Ambalal Barot v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Mumbai) & Ors
Date of order
15 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Atul Ambalal Barot v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Mumbai) & Ors, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3689 OF 2018
Atul Ambalal Barot..Petitioner
Versus
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Mumbai) & Ors. ..Respondents
...................
•Mr. M.M. Vashi, Senior Counsel a/w Ms. Aparna Deokar, Ms.Prachi Khandge i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Petitioner has prayed for direction to the Income TaxAuthorities to take action against respondent Nos. 5 to 9 forallegedly having paid cash of Rs. 2,71,32,000/- in course ofland deal.
2.The facts on record would suggest that the petitionerclaims to be the owner of the parcel of land havingpurchased under registered sale deed. Respondent Nos. 5 to9 also claimed ownership of the same land. In the sale deed,according to the petitioner, there is recitation that said
purchasers had paid a sum of Rs. 2,71,32,000/- in cash. Thedispute interse between the petitioner and the saidrespondents are pending before the Civil Court. We do notfind it appropriate to give any directions as prayed for. Thecorum of the High Court cannot be used for brining pressureon the respondents to settle the private dispute. Petitiondismissed.
[ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.