Atul Ishwardas Chordia v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
18 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Atul Ishwardas Chordia v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Atul Ishwardas Chordia v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 210 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 9 OF 2014
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 903 OF 2014
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 211 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 10 OF 2014
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 919 OF 2014
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 212 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 8 OF 2014
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 904 OF 2014
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 213 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 11 OF 2014
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 908 OF 2014
Atul Ishwardas ChordiaVersusDy. Commissioner of Income Tax
…Appellant
…Respondent
Mr. Niraj Sheth, a/w Mr. P. C. Thripathi, for the Applicant/Appellant in all Appeals.Mr. Tejveer Singh,for the Respondents in all Appeals.
PC:-
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ.DATED:18th January 2016
1.Having perused the Affidavit in Support, we are of the view that the delay which has occurred has been properly, sufficiently and reasonably explained, the same stand condoned in each of these motions.
2.will be no order as to costs.
The Notice of Motions are, therefore, made absolute. There
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
(S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue