Audi Munuswamy v. State Rep. By: The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15 (1)
High Court
14 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Audi Munuswamy v. State Rep. By: The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15 (1)
Date of order
14 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Audi Munuswamy v. State Rep. By: The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15 (1), the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.This criminal original petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P. No.6219 of 2024and Crl.M.P. Nos.4550 & 4551 of 2024
Audi Munuswamy
Vs
...Petitioner
State Rep. by: The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 15 (1),121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai – 600 034.
... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in E.O.C.C.No.394 of 2018 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Economic Offences II, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same.
For Petitioner: Mr.D.Manimaran
For Respondents: No Appearance
O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in E.O.C.C.No.394 of 2018 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Economic Offences II, Egmore, Chennai.
2.On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is seen that the petitioner is
aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below dated 09.02.2024 to the effect that
both the parties must clarify as to why another power agent and principal should not be added as an accused in this case.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by virtue of this order passed, the main defence that was taken by the petitioner is sought to be defeated by the Court below.
4.If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed on 09.02.2024, the petitioner
should specifically challenge that order and there is no question of challenging the entire proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to quash the pending case in E.O.C.C.No.394 of 2018. It cannot be done at this stage, since the trial itself has been concluded and the
arguments have also been addressed by both sides. When the above was brought to the notice of this Court, the learned counsel submitted that he will challenge the order dated 09.02.2024 before this Court. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings pursuant to the order passed on 09.02.2024.
5.This criminal original petition is disposed of in the above terms. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
14.03.2024
Index : Yes/NoSpeaking order:Yes/NoNeutral citation:Yes/Nossr
To
1.The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Economic Offences II, Egmore, Chennai. Egmore, Chennai.
2.The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 15 (1), 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
ssr
Crl.O.P. No.6219 of 2024and Crl.M.P. Nos.4550 & 4551 of 2024
14.03.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.