Case LawHigh Court › Automotive Component Manufacturers Assoc...

Automotive Component Manufacturers Association Of India v. The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemption

High Court 23 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Automotive Component Manufacturers Association Of India v. The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemption
Date of order
23 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Automotive Component Manufacturers Association Of India v. The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemption, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 766/2017 AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kavita Jha, Adv. versus THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 23.03.2018 The assessee had questioned the invocation of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”) by the Commissioner in an appeal to the ITAT which was subsequently withdrawn. The impugned order recorded the withdrawal of that appeal. In the meanwhile, the concerned AO gave effect to the substantive order of the CIT(A) and brought to tax the amounts under Section 11(3) of the Act. The assessee’s appeal to the CIT(A) was rejected primarily on the ground that it had withdrawn its previous appeal questioning the assumption under Section 263 ITA 766/2017 Page 1 of 2 of the Act. It is not disputed that the assessee’s appeal (appeal to the ITAT) against the order of the CIT(A) (dated 23.03.2017) is pending before the ITAT. Having regard to these peculiar circumstances, it is clarified that the ITAT should consider the substantive merits of the appeal with respect to the assessee’s taxability of amounts under Section 11(3) of the Act without in any manner holding adversely against it, for the withdrawal of the previous appeal (which was concerned only with the question of assumption of taxability under Section 263 of the Act). The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 23, 2018 kks A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan