Avantika Mishra v. Income Tax Department & Anr
High Court
14 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Avantika Mishra v. Income Tax Department & Anr
Date of order
14 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Avantika Mishra v. Income Tax Department & Anr, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: With above agreed directions, the writ petition along with pending application is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C ) 2575/2019 & CM APPL. 11986/2019
AVANTIKA MISHRA
..... Petitioner
Through: Ms.Shashi Kiran and Mr.Arjun Sain, Advocates
versus
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT & ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aayushmaan, Mr.Ashish Jain and Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Standing Counsels for R-1.
Ms.Jagriti Ahuja and Mr.Aditya Bakshi, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R14.03.2019
%
The matter has been received on transfer from Division Bench-II.
Notice.
Learned counsels for the respondents accept notice.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the attachment order passed by the respondent No.1 addressed to the Bank Manager, HDFC Bank/respondent No.2 herein.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reading of the attachment order would show that the same pertains to a demand with respect to her deceased father. She submits that no order of attachment has been received by her nor any show-cause notice was issued prior to passing
of the attachment order nor any hearing was granted. She further submits that a direction be issued to the respondents to withdraw the attachment order and in case of any demand, a proper opportunity of hearing be granted to the petitioner in accordance with law.
After some hearing, it is agreed that attachment order dated 18.02.2019 shall be withdrawn subject to the following conditions:
(i)The department, if so advised will issue a show- cause notice to the petitioner and grant her an opportunity of hearing. the petitioner and grant her an opportunity of hearing.
(ii)Petitioner shall not withdraw Rs.70,50,000/- from the said bank account & FDRs till the disposal of the appeal/proceedings which may be initiated against her after giving her an opportunity of hearing. account & FDRs till the disposal of the appeal/proceedings which may be initiated against her after giving her an opportunity of hearing.
With above agreed directions, the writ petition along with pending application is disposed of.
Respondent no.2 shall ensure compliance of the statement made by the petitioner today before the court.
A copy of this order be given dasti under signature of court master.
G.S.SISTANI, J
MARCH 14, 2019 ssc
W.P.(C ) 2575/2019
JYOTI SINGH, J
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.