In Avdhesh Mittal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax -10, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6273/2024
AVDHESH MITTAL
.....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -10
& ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. V.K. Saksena and Ms. Hemlata Rawat
Anand, JSCs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R% 23.10.2024
1.None appears for the petitioner.
2.It is noted that none had appeared for the petitioner on the previous hearing as on 01.08.2024. hearing as on 01.08.2024.
3.Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
OCTOBER 23, 2024
zp
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue