Case Law › High Court › Avenir Management Consulting (India) Pvt...

Avenir Management Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd. And Ors v. Income Tax Office

High Court 20 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Avenir Management Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd. And Ors v. Income Tax Office, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~31 to 33 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(31) CRL.M.C. 2421/2022 & CRL.M.A. 10189/2022 & 10190/2022 10190/2022 AVENIR MANAGEMENT CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Pawas Kulshrestha, Mr.Parv Garg & Mr.K.S. Rekhi, Advs. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Pawas Kulshrestha, Mr.Parv Garg & Mr.K.S. Rekhi, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. St. Counsel with Ms.Deeksha Gupta. Counsel with Ms.Deeksha Gupta. (32)+ CRL.M.C. 2457/2022 & CRL.M.A. 10315/2022 & 10316/2022 AVENIR MANAGEMENT CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Pawas Kulshrestha, Mr.Parv Garg & Mr.K.S. Rekhi, Advs. 10316/2022 AVENIR MANAGEMENT CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Pawas Kulshrestha, Mr.Parv Garg & Mr.K.S. Rekhi, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Aseem Chawla, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms.Pratistha Chaudhary & Mr.Naveen Rohila, Advs. Standing Counsel with Ms.Pratistha Chaudhary & Mr.Naveen Rohila, Advs. (33) CRL.M.C. 2458/2022 & CRL.M.A. 10319/2022 & 10320/2022 AVENIR MANAGEMENT CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioner 10320/2022 AVENIR MANAGEMENT CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioner AVENIR MANAGEMENT CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioner LTD. AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Pawas Kulshrestha, Mr.Parv Garg & Mr.K.S. Rekhi, Advs. Garg & Mr.K.S. Rekhi, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Aseem Chawla, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms.Pratistha Chaudhary & Standing Counsel with Ms.Pratistha Chaudhary & Mr.Naveen Rohila, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R D E R20.02.2024 % 1.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the offence already stands compounded vide order dated 08.12.2023. 2.In view of the above, the present petitions have been rendered infructuous and the same are disposed of as such. NAVIN CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 20, 2024/rv Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.