Avinash Singh Son Of Late Shankar Singh v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur
High Court
21 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Avinash Singh Son Of Late Shankar Singh v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur
Date of order
21 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Avinash Singh Son Of Late Shankar Singh v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
T.A No. 8 of 2016
Avinash Singh son of Late Shankar Singh, Prop. M/s Singh Trading co., Near Hanuman Mandir, Main Road, Mango, P.O- Mango, Town-Jamshedpur, P.S. Mango, District-East Singhbhum, PIN-831012.
…… Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur having its office at 47, C.H Area, P.S-Bistupur, P.O-Bistupur, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East, PIN-831011. ………. Respondent
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
----------
For the Appellants : Ms. Rakhi Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate
-----------
Oral Judgment:Order No.16/Dated: 21[st]January, 2021
1. With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The instant appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order dated 26.10.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi in I.T.A No.40/RAN/2013 for the Assessment year 2009-10, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant in course of argument, has submitted by putting reliance upon the Act which has been notified on 17.03.2020, known as ‘The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020’ and
sought for leave of this Court to withdraw the instant appeal to take recourse
of the aforesaid provision for redressal of his grievance.
4. Mr. Rahul Lamba, learned counsel for the respondent has raised no objection.
5. In view of such submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is disposed of, however, with liberty to the appellant to approach before the competent authority as per the provision made in ‘The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020’.
6. Needless to say, if such application would be filed by the appellant under the aforesaid provision, it would be dealt with by the competent authority in accordance with law.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.)
Saket/-
N.A.F.R.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.