Case LawHigh Court › Awadhesh Pandey, Son Of Late Darbari Pan...

Awadhesh Pandey, Son Of Late Darbari Pandey, Resident Of Village Prakashpuri, Shital Tola, P.s. Ara Town, District Bhojpur v. The Union Of India

High Court 26 Nov 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Awadhesh Pandey, Son Of Late Darbari Pandey, Resident Of Village Prakashpuri, Shital Tola, P.s. Ara Town, District Bhojpur v. The Union Of India
Date of order
26 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Awadhesh Pandey, Son Of Late Darbari Pandey, Resident Of Village Prakashpuri, Shital Tola, P.s. Ara Town, District Bhojpur v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2010) decided the matter under Section 277 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41433 of 2006 AWADHESH PANDEY, Son of Late Darbari Pandey, Resident of Village Prakashpuri, Shital Tola, P.S. Ara Town, District Bhojpur. ………Petitioner Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA, Through the Commissioner, Income Tax, Patna. 2.GOPALJI RAM, Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 1, Ara Town, P.S. Ara, District Bhojpur. …….Opposite Parties ----------- 04/- 26-11-2010 Heard Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rishi Raj Sinha learned counsel for the Revenue and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application seeking quashing of order dated 06.01.2006 passed by learned Special Judge, Economic Offence, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1 of 2006 taking cognizance for the offence under Sections 277 & 276 CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to agitate all his points before the trial court at the time of hearing on the point of charge. Permission is granted. Accordingly this application stands disposed of as withdrawn. The court below shall take into consideration that there is no order on merit. The court below shall pass appropriate order on the materials available without being prejudiced of instant non-interference. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan