Awt/3/2017 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central -1 v. Konark Commercial Pvt. Ltd
High Court
10 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Awt/3/2017 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central -1 v. Konark Commercial Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
10 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Awt/3/2017 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central -1 v. Konark Commercial Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Issue: The appeal was admitted on 4[th] June, 2018 on the following substantial question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of the Ld.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect and the substantial question of law framed for consideration is left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
od 1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (WEALTH TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
AWT/3/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1 VS KONARK COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD.
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM
-A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : January 10, 2025.
Appearance :Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …for appellant Mrs Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhertha Das, Adv. …for respondent
The Court :- This is an appeal filed by the revenue under Section 27A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (the Act) challenging the order dated 13[th] January, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata in WTA 45-46/Kol/2014 for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08.
The appeal was admitted on 4[th] June, 2018 on the following substantial question of law.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of the Ld. Tribunal has erred in law as well as on fact in holding that the property in question shall be exempted from Wealth Tax under Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 and outside the ambit of Wealth Tax Act?”.
Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant/revenue we have directed Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned standing Counsel to appear on behalf of the appellant/revenue and his appearance may be regularised.
We have heard Mrs. Swapna Das and Mr. Siddhartha Das, learned Advocates for the respondent.
As could be seen from the assessment order for both years, the tax effect is far below the threshold limit. Therefore, the revenue cannot prosecute the matter any further. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect and the substantial question of law framed for consideration is left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
pkd/GH.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.