Ayushi Builders & Developers v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2), Jodhpur
High Court
10 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Ayushi Builders & Developers v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2), Jodhpur
Date of order
10 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ayushi Builders & Developers v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2), Jodhpur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is allowed, accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 122 / 2010
Ayushi Builders & Developers, 101, Babu Rajendra Marg, Masuria, Jodhpur
----Appellant
Versus
The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(2), Jodhpur
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anjay Kothari, with Mr. Bhagirath PatelFor Respondent(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUROrder
10/07/2017
The issue involved in this appeal stands covered by a
judgment of Calcutta High Court in Piu Ghosh Vs. DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax (Income Tax Appeal No.191/2009decided on 12.07.2016). Accordingly, the issue involved inquestion No.1 is decided in favour of the appellant-assessee interms of the judgment referred above.
In light of the finding arrived with regard to questionNo.1, the question No.2 remains only an academic question,therefore, that is not required to be answered.
The appeal is allowed, accordingly.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR) J.
(GOVIND MATHUR) J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.