Babu Lal Jain (Huf) v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block, Secretariat,Building, New Delhi
High Court
13 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Babu Lal Jain (Huf) v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block, Secretariat,Building, New Delhi
Date of order
13 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Babu Lal Jain (Huf) v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block, Secretariat,Building, New Delhi, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19759/2022
Babu Lal Jain (Huf), R/o 46, Vasundhara Colony Tonk Road,Jaipur, 302018 Rajasthan, India Through Karta Babu Lal Jain S/oShri Gulab Chand Jain Aged 74 Years R/o 46, Vasundhra ColonyTonk Road, Jaipur, 302018, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7 (2), Sidhnath Bhawan, Jaipur,Rajas, Jyoti Nagar Scheme, Lal Kothi Scheme, BehindNew Vidhan Sabha, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302015.Rajas, Jyoti Nagar Scheme, Lal Kothi Scheme, BehindNew Vidhan Sabha, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302015.
2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block, Secretariat,Building, New Delhi, 110001.Building, New Delhi, 110001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Gargieya withMr. Devang GargieyaMr. Devang GargieyaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sandeep Pathak with
Ms. Jaya P. Pathak
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
13/12/2024
1.Heard.
2.A prayer for amendment has been made in the petitionseeking to challenge the order passed in assessment during thependency of the petition.
2.1. It is however, not disputed that at the same time, thepetitioner, has also filed a statutory appeal available to him underthe law.
2.2. Since all the grounds which have been raised in the writpetition can be looked into by the Appellate Authority in theappeal in exercise of its power, we are not inclined to proceedfurther in the matter. We leave it open to the petitioner to raise all
the grounds available to him under the law to assail the order ofassessment including those grounds which are raised in thispetition.
3.The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
N.Gandhi/Gaurav/8
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.