Babulal K. Shah v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City I, Mumbai
High Court
16 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Babulal K. Shah v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City I, Mumbai
Date of order
16 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Babulal K. Shah v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax City I, Mumbai, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONCHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 2016 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 62 OF 1991
Babulal K. Shah
...Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax City I, Mumbai.
...Respondent
Ms. Aasifa Khan i/b D.M. Harish & Co., for the Applicant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & A.V. POTDAR, JJ.March 16, 2012.
P.C.:-
1.Not on Board. Taken on Board with the consent of Counsel.
2.The Chamber Summons has been taken out for condonation of delay
and for bringing the legal heirs of the Appellant on record. The Appellant died on 3 October, 2010. Sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a) and (d). Amendment to be carried within a period of two weeks from today.
(A.V. POTDAR, J.)(DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue