Case LawHigh Court › Babulal Kishoringji Dudhawat v. The Chie...

Babulal Kishoringji Dudhawat v. The Chief Cit-I, Pune & Ors

High Court 16 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Babulal Kishoringji Dudhawat v. The Chief Cit-I, Pune & Ors
Date of order
16 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Babulal Kishoringji Dudhawat v. The Chief Cit-I, Pune & Ors, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7506 OF 2009 Babulal Kishoringji Dudhawat Vs.The Chief CIT-I, Pune & Ors. ..Petitioner ..Respondents Mr.R.N.Sanghvi for petitioner.Mr.Vimal Gupta for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. 16[th] NOVEMBER, 2009 DATE : P.C. Heard. Mr.Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that respondent No.2 shall decide the application dated 24[th] February, 2004 moved by the petitioner, within six weeks from today by a reasoned order following principles of natural justice. At the same time, respondent No.2 shall also consider and decide the application filed by the petitioner for certified copies. In view of this statement, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan