Case LawHigh Court › Bajaria Brothers v. Commissioner Of Inco...

Bajaria Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 13 Aug 1999 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Bajaria Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
13 Aug 1999
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bajaria Brothers v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (1999) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO Nos.1 to 5 NO -------------------------------------------------------------- BAJARIA BROTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner MR MANISH R...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 1 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and Sd/- MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO Nos.1 to 5 NO -------------------------------------------------------------- BAJARIA BROTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 13/08/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per B.C.Patel,J) �Learned Counsel for the assessee has placed before us the Xerox copy of the letter addressed to assessee by the Office of the Commissioner of Income-tax dated 23.2.1999 indicating the benefits granted under Karvivad Samadhan Scheme 1988. Along with the letter Xerox copy of intimation under section 90(1) in respect of Karvivad Samadhan Scheme is also enclosed. Challan in respect of the payment is also enclosed. In view of this he states that this reference is not required to be answered. Mr.M.R.Bhatt, learned Counsel has fairly stated that the question raised by the revenue is not required to be answered as proceedings have been terminated and now there is no dispute with regard to the question raised. Hence permission is granted to withdraw the reference. Rule is discharged. No order as to cost. ���----- m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan