Bajrang Power And Ispat Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh
High Court
02 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Bajrang Power And Ispat Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh
Date of order
02 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Bajrang Power And Ispat Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In the said circumstances, the writ appeal as well as application to condone the delay both are dismissed as withdrawn. / Sd/- Sd/-(P.R.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WA No. 528 of 2018
(Arising out of order dated 22.09.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in
Writ Petition No.4990 of 2009)
Bajrang Power and Ispat Ltd 522/C, Urla Industrial Estate, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Asstt. Commissioner Income Tax, Circle 2(1), Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. The Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, 100. Middletown Row, 2nd Floor, KolkataKolkata
---- Respondents
_____________________________________________________________________For Appellant: Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate. For Respondents:Shri Ajay Kumrani, Advocate under instructions of Shri Amit Choudhary, Advocate
______________________________________________________________________
Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board
P. R. Ramachandra Menon, CJ.
02.07.2019
1.The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that a memo seeking for
permission to withdraw the appeal has been filed by him.
2.In the said circumstances, the writ appeal as well as application to condone the
delay both are dismissed as withdrawn.
/ Sd/- Sd/-(P.R. Ramachandra Menon) Chief Justice Judge
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
Hem
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue