Baker Hughes Energy Technology Uk Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 1 2, International Taxation & Ors

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8990/2024 BAKER HUGHES ENERGY TECHNOLOGY UK LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Ms. Disha Jham, Ms. Soumya Singh, Mr. Devansh Jain, Mr. Raghav Dutt, Ms. Menita Khanna and Mr. Aditya Rathore, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 1 2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, Advocates. % CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R12.08.2024 1.We are informed by Mr. Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, who on instructions states that an amount of INR 23,01,03,917 has already been refunded to the writ petitioner. Apart from the above, the respondents have also computed interest payable in terms of Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961[‘Act’] at INR 1,74,96,670/- and which is stated to have been released. 2.According to Mr. Rai, the only amount which is now left as payable is INR 11,22,68,605/-, and which too shall be refunded within a period of three weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded payable is INR 11,22,68,605/-, and which too shall be refunded within a period of three weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded and accepted. 3.In view of the aforesaid, and since nothing further would survive, we dispose of the writ petition. 4.In case there be any other claims or disputes with respect to computation, we leave it open to the writ petitioner to adopt such other remedies as may be available in law, including under Section 154 of the Act. All rights and contentions of respective parties in that respect are kept open. YASHWANT VARMA, J. AUGUST 12, 2024/ib RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.