Case LawHigh Court › Balbir Singh Miaini v. Income Tax Appell...

Balbir Singh Miaini v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar And Others

High Court 31 Jul 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Balbir Singh Miaini v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar And Others
Date of order
31 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Balbir Singh Miaini v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar And Others, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: Counsel for the respondents points out that as the petitioner has complied with the impugned order and depositedRs.05 lacs with the concerned authority on 15.3.2013, the dispute inthe present case is purely academic but he has no objection if the Civil Writ Petition No.23980 of 2012 2 writ petition...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Civil Writ Petition No.23980 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.23980 of 2012Date of Decision: 31.7.2013 Balbir Singh Miaini ..Petitioner versus Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar and others ..Respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present:Mr. Ravish Sood, Advocate with Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents. RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner challenges order dated 09.11.2012whereby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench,Amritsar, (for short the “Tribunal”) has directed the petitioner todeposit Rs.05 lacs for extension of the stay order granted in hisfavour. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after expiry of theperiod prescribed for deciding an appeal, the Tribunal has nojurisdiction to vary the stay order by imposing a fresh conditionrequiring pre-deposit of any amount. Counsel for the respondents points out that as the petitioner has complied with the impugned order and depositedRs.05 lacs with the concerned authority on 15.3.2013, the dispute inthe present case is purely academic but he has no objection if the Civil Writ Petition No.23980 of 2012 2 writ petition is disposed of by directing the Tribunal to decide theappeal, within a fixed period of time. We have heard counsel for the parties and as we are notinclined to answer the academic question posed, in view of deposit ofthe amount by the petitioner, dispose of the writ petition by directingthe Tribunal to decide the petitioner's appeal, within three months ofreceipt of a certified copy of this order. ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) JUDGE 31.7.2013VK ( DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON ) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan