Balkrishna v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J
High Court
24 Dec 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Balkrishna v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J
Date of order
24 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Balkrishna v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1578 OF 2014
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2063 OF 2014
Indian Plastics Institute}AppellantversusDirector of Income Tax (Exemption)}Respondent
Balkrishna V. Jhaveri for the Appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM :-S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED :-DECEMBER 24, 2014
P.C. :-
Herd both sides. We have perused the affidavit in support of this Notice of Motion. Having perused the same, we do not find any basis for the objection raised by the Revenue. The delay has occurred on account of bonafide and genuine reasons. In these circumstances, this Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would no order as to costs. The Appeal be numbered and posted for admission as per its turn.
(A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue