Case Law › High Court › Ballabhdas Udhodas Mohta v. The Commissi...

Ballabhdas Udhodas Mohta v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur

High Court 16 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

16 Jan 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ballabhdas Udhodas Mohta v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.1932/2016 IN M.C.A.. ST. NO. 19634/2016 (BALLABHDAS UDHODAS MOHTA VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.S. Bhattad, counsel for the applicant.Shri A. Parchure, counsel for the respondent. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE:JANUARY 16, 2017. Heard. Though the learned counsel for the departmentopposes the prayer, for the reasons stated in the application,the prayer is granted and the delay in filing the restorationapplication is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO.19634/2016. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, theprayer is granted subject to the payment of deficit court feeswithin two weeks and payment of Rupees Five Hundred tothe High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within one week. The miscellaneous civil application is allowed inthe aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.