Case LawHigh Court › Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Incom...

Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income

High Court 21 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
21 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bank Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Issue: The present appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that the applicant’s income by way of comission on account of electricity bills and on account of miscellaneous sales, w...

Decision: In view thereof the income tax reference is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2002 Bombay Mercantile Coop. Bank Ltd. ..Appellant vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Special Range-29 ..Respondent Ms.Asifa Khan i/b Mr.S.M.Lal for appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and respondents. The present appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that the applicant’s income by way of comission on account of electricity bills and on account of miscellaneous sales, was not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act?" 2. Both the learned Counsel categorically state that with regard to assessee’s own case similar question of law has been decided by this Court in Income Tax Reference No.19 of 2000 decided on 17th July, 2003 in the case of Bombay Mercantile Coop. Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax wherein this Court has answered the question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. In view thereof for the same reasons in the present appeal also the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. In view thereof the income tax reference is disposed of. KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan