In Bank Of Baroda v. Dcitreported In (2010 328 Itr 081 (Bom, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 2In view of that, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.195 OF 2015
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – 2)...APPELLANT
V/s.
BANK OF BARODA)...RESPONDENT
Ms.Samiksha Kanani i/b. Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/b. Mr.A.K.Jasani, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A. M. BADAR, JJ.DATE:10[th] JULY 2017
P.C. :
1This appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2007-08. The learned counsel for the appellant fairly concedes that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of this court in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs. DCITreported in (2010 328 ITR 081 (Bom).
2In view of that, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.)
avk 1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue