Bankim Bhagwanji Chaauhan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1
High Court
11 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Bankim Bhagwanji Chaauhan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1
Date of order
11 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Bankim Bhagwanji Chaauhan v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14021 of 2019With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16197 of 2019
==========================================================
BANKIM BHAGWANJI CHAAUHAN Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1
==========================================================
Appearance:DARSHAN R PATEL(8486) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 09/07/2021
COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.We have perused the Office Note.
2.It appears that these matters were heard and ordered to bedisposed of on 23.03.2021. However, the matters had to be re-notifiedfor further hearing on 11.06.2021. After hearing the learned counsel forthe parties on 11.06.2021, the order was passed allowing the writapplications.
3.In the order passed by this Court, the date of the judgment isshown as 23.03.2021. Registry wants this Court to correct the date asthe mattes were relisted on 11.06.2021.
4.Under such circumstances, date of the judgment shall be shownas 11.06.2021.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
SUCHIT
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.