Case LawHigh Court › Banwari Lal Yadav v. State Of Rajasthan...

Banwari Lal Yadav v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p

High Court 01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Banwari Lal Yadav v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Banwari Lal Yadav v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case, this petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. 4[th] BAIL APPLICATION NO.14473/2017 Banwari Lal yadav, S/o Shri Birdharam yadav, age 60 years, R/o House No. 310, Shri Gopal Nagar, Gopalpura By Pass, Jaipur, Additional Commissioner Income tax department, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent __________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. P.R.S. Rajawat For Respondent : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar, P.P. __________________________________________ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order 01/11/2017 Petitioner has filed this interim bail petition underSection 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regularbail in F.I.R. No.34/2017 registered at Police Station PradhanAaraxi Kendre, A.C.B, Jaipur, Chowki Alwar for offences underSection 7, 13(1)D, 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988and Section 384 Indian Penal Code, 1860. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner be granted interim bail to enable him toattend the marriage of his son. Learned state counsel has placed on record thereport submitted by the concerned police station and as perthe same, marriage of the son of the petitioner is to beperformed on 4.11.2017. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner beadmitted to interim bail subject to satisfaction of the TrialCourt. Petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial courton 7.11.2017 at 10.00 a.m. (SABINA)J. Mohita/130
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan