Bar Council Of Rajasthan Jodhpur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur
High Court
27 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Bar Council Of Rajasthan Jodhpur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur
Date of order
27 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Bar Council Of Rajasthan Jodhpur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In light of the above, the present writ petition is allowed.The impugned order dated 08.03.2001 for the assessment years1971-72 to 1976-77 (Annex.4) is hereby quashed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 594/2002
Bar Council of Rajasthan Jodhpur, through its Secretary, Shri OmPrakash Gupta, Advocate.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.
2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Anjay Kothari.
: Mr. K.K. Bissa.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
27/09/2023(Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issueinvolved in the present case is covered by the judgment of theHon’ble Supreme Court in favour of the petitioner. In this regardreference has been made to the judgment of Hon’ble SupremeCourt in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bar Council ofMaharashtra [(1981) 49 CCH 0316 ISCC] and the judgment ofthis Court in Bar Council of Rajasthan Vs. Commissioner ofIncome Tax [(1984) 52 CCH 00023 RajHC].
2.In light of the above, the present writ petition is allowed.The impugned order dated 08.03.2001 for the assessment years1971-72 to 1976-77 (Annex.4) is hereby quashed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ
22-a.asopa/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.