Baramati Agro Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 70 OF 2007 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 70 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 17 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 17 OF 2007 Baramati Agro Ltd. ... Appellant Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax... Respondent Mr.Bhushan Mahadik for Appellant. Mr.Vimap Gupta & Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: FEBRUARY 13, 2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 13, 2008 P.C. . Heard parties. . Considering the delay and the cause shown in the affidavit in support of the Motion, the same amounts to sufficient cause. Hence, delay can be condoned subject to cost being imposed. . In the light of the above, delay condoned subject to Appellants’ paying cost to the Respondents quantified at Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) as a condition precedent. The cost to be paid within six weeks from today. The Office objections, if any to be removed within six weeks from today. If either cost is not paid or office objections are not removed within six weeks, Appeal to stand dismissed for non prosecution, without further reference to this court. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)