Case Law › High Court › Basf Industries Limited v. The Additiona...

Basf Industries Limited v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 21 Sep 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

21 Sep 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Basf Industries Limited v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2216 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.968 OF 2011 BASF Industries Limited .. AppellantVs.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax.. Respondent. Mr. B.D.Damodhar i/b Kanga & Co. for the Appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent. CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. By consent the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office objections to be removed within two weeks from today. Accordingly, the present Notice of Motion is disposed of with no orders as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.