Case Law › High Court › B.c. Biyaji Project Pvt. Ltd v. Commissi...

B.c. Biyaji Project Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iinashik And Others

High Court 07 Mar 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

07 Mar 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In B.c. Biyaji Project Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iinashik And Others, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10740 OF 2012 B.C. Biyaji Project Pvt. Ltd. .. PETITIONER/S VERSUS Commissioner of Income Tax IINashik and others. .. RESPONDENT/S Mr. M.K. Kulkarni with Mr. R.R. Chandak, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for respondents. With WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2013 Tulsi Extrusions Ltd. VERSUS .. PETITIONER/S The Union of India and others. ..RESPONDENT/S Mr. R.R. Chandak, Advocate for petitioner.Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for respondents. CORAM :- A.H. JOSHI & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.DATE :- 7TH MARCH, 2013. ORDER :- 1]In the midst of hearing, learned Advocate for both the petitioners states that the petitioners would like to have comprehensive petitions. He, therefore, prays for liberty to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions for same or more reliefs. 2]withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Writ petitions are disposed of as [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH,J][A.H. JOSHI,J] grt/-.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.