Case LawHigh Court › Bengali Singh (Huf) v. The Assistant Com...

Bengali Singh (Huf) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna

High Court 30 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Bengali Singh (Huf) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna
Date of order
30 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bengali Singh (Huf) v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: These Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.299 of 2011 =========================================================== Bengali Singh (HUF) through its karta Bengali Singh, Aged about 77 years, S/o Sant Lal, R/o Sumitra Sadan, Boring Road, P.S.-S.K.Puri, Dist-Patna. … .... Appellant Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna. With … .... Respondent =========================================================== Miscellaneous Appeal No. 587 of 2014 =========================================================== Bengali Singh (HUF) through its karta Sri Bengali Singh aged about 80 years Son of Late Sant Lal R/o Sumitra Sadan, Mohalla Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, District Patna … .... Appellant Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna. With … .... Respondent =========================================================== Miscellaneous Appeal No. 588 of 2014 =========================================================== Bengali Singh (HUF) through its Karta Sri Bengali Singh aged about 80 years S/o Late Sant Lal R/o Sumitra Sadan, Mohalla Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, District Patna Versus .... .... Appellant The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna. With .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Miscellaneous Appeal No. 589 of 2014 =========================================================== Bengali Singh (HUF) through its Karta Sri Bengali Singh aged about 80 years S/o Late Sant Lal R/o Sumitra Sadan, Mohalla Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, District Patna .... .... Appellant Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna. .... .... Respondent With =========================================================== Miscellaneous Appeal No. 590 of 2014 =========================================================== Bengali Singh (HUF) through its karta Sri Bengali Singh aged about 80 years S/o Late Sant Lal R/o Sumitra Sadan, Mohalla Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, District Patna .... .... Appellant Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna. With .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Miscellaneous Appeal No. 591 of 2014 =========================================================== Bengali Singh (HUF) through its Karta Sri Bengali Singh aged about 80 years S/o Late Sant Lal R/o Sumitra Sadan, Mohalla Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, District Patna .... ....Appellant Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle 4), Patna. .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance:(In MA No.299 of 2011) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.587 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.588 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.589 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.590 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.591 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.589 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.590 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. (In MA No.591 of 2014) For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mr. Archana Prasad, Jr. Counsel. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTAand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 30-08-2016 None appears for the appellant again. Even on 16.08.2016 and 23.08.2016, none had put in appearance for the appellant. These Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. (Hemant Gupta, J) Mishra/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date02.09.2016Transmission N.A. Date
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan