In Berg Trading Ltd. Mumbai v. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax Special Range-25, Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. [SANDEEP K.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 565 OF 2007
Berg Trading Ltd. Mumbai
.. Appellant
VERSUS
Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax Special Range-25, Mumbai... Respondent
….
Mr. Subhash Shetty for Appellant.
….
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 29[th] JUNE, 2018
P.C. :-
Mr. Subhash Shetty learned Counsel appearing in
.Mr. Subhash Shetty learned Counsel appearing insupport of the appellant, on instructions seeks to withdraw theappeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue