Case Law › High Court › Best Realtech India Private Limited v. I...

Best Realtech India Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) & Anr

High Court 27 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

27 Nov 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Best Realtech India Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) & Anr, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12644/2018, CM APPL. 49099-49100/2018 BEST REALTECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor & Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advs. Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor & Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advs. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(3) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R% 27.11.2018 After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions of the petitioner in the re-assessment proceedings are kept open. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NOVEMBER 27, 2018/akv PRATEEK JALAN, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.